Browsing by Author "Bhola, Shaily"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Comparative Perspectives on Chemistry Teaching and Learning in Higher Education(University of Calgary, 2015-06) Bhola, Shaily; Parchoma, Gale; Werklund School of EducationScience learning in higher education has been examined in light of the cognitivist and constructivist theories of learning and ways in which these theories can inform teaching practices. Science teaching practices have been studied from developmental and pedagogical content knowledge perspectives. This paper provides a review of seminal and recent literature on research advances in chemistry education, and the application of constructivist learning theories to teaching and learning.Item Open Access Designing for Student Engagement in an Online Doctoral Research Method Course(University of Calgary, 2016-05) Simmons, Marlon; Parchoma, Gale; Jacobsen, Michele; Nelson, Dorothea; Bhola, Shaily; Werklund School of EducationThis paper is a report on preliminary findings of a scholarship of teaching and learning inquiry into a redesign of an online doctoral research course to include purposefully designed cycles of less formal auditory synchronous discussions with more formal text-based asynchronous discussions. The research design includes thematic analyses of archived auditory and text-based student engagements with learning resources, and with peers and the instructor, as well as student feedback via focus groups and individual interviews. The research design, data collection and data analysis procedures are explained and preliminary findings discussed. Recommendations for practice are shared.Item Open Access Students’ Meaning-Making of Physical Chemistry Concepts: A Resources Perspective(2021-09) Bhola, Shaily; Sengupta, Pratim; Shanahan, Marie-Claire; Kim, BeaumieChemistry forms an integral part of undergraduate STEM education, and the literature demonstrates that students experience conceptual difficulties in understanding key ideas in the discipline. While some scholars have argued for an ontologically disconnected view of learning in which students’ intuitive ideas need to be discarded in order to learn key disciplinary ideas, in this dissertation, I built on views of learning as a gradual and continuous process of refining prior ideas (bootstrapping), known as the Knowledge-in-Pieces framework (diSessa, 1993; diSessa & Sherin, 1998). The research questions I sought to investigate through this study are: How do undergraduate students develop explanations of problems in chemistry during tutorial conversations? and How do they bring together and/or deal with the dissonance between different sets of resources, representational, linguistic, and intuitive? I report a study that was conducted with first year undergraduate students as they worked in small groups during tutorial sessions in a naturalistic manner. Tutorials are a common and yet understudied form of learning experience for chemistry students at the undergraduate level. This was a qualitative study that used audio-recordings of group conversations and students’ field notes as sources of data. The data was coded for resources using thematic analysis and the constant comparison method. This study sheds light on students’ use of heterogeneous resources that are representational (graphs, chemical equations, expressions), linguistic (colloquial and terminological language) and conceptual (p-prims, symbolic forms, graphical forms). Furthermore, my analysis also suggests that a distributed form of meaning-making supported students’ conceptual understanding, which included invoking diverse conceptual schemas, language use and different forms of representational work. Based on the findings, the implications for undergraduate chemistry education include supporting students by paying attention to the heterogeneity of their representational and conceptual resources and designing purposeful opportunities for the integration of these resources.