Browsing by Author "Mewhort, Holly E. M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Adhesive-Enhanced Sternal Closure: Feasibility and Safety of Late Sternal Reentry
    (2017-05-29) Spooner, Aaron J.; Mewhort, Holly E. M.; DiFrancesco, Lisa M.; Fedak, Paul W. M.
    This clinical case report describes sternal reentry performed years after adhesive-enhanced sternal closure using Kryptonite bone cement. This report provides novel data on the late effects of this innovation. We observed that sternal reentry is feasible and safe. The adhesive did not weaken from biodegradation over a period of several years. There was no evidence of adherence to adjacent soft tissues or other nonbony deep mediastinal structures. Surgeons who receive patients who require redoing cardiac surgery after adhesive-enhanced closure with Kryptonite can be reassured that sternal reentry is safe and feasible.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Surgical Application of ECM-Biomaterial Enhances Myocardial Recovery Following Myocardial Infarction
    (2016) Mewhort, Holly E. M.; Fedak, Paul W. M.; Giles, Wayne; Duff, Henry; Yong, Voon Wee
    Introduction: Ongoing improvements in the management of coronary artery disease continue to reduce mortality following myocardial infarction (MI), however, as a consequence the incidence of ischemic heart failure is on the rise. Healthy extracellular matrix (ECM) provides important cues that regulate cell function and survival. Dysregulation of the ECM following MI leads to cardiac fibrosis, left ventricular (LV) dilatation and heart failure. Here we assess whether ECM biology can be leveraged as a therapy to enhance myocardial recovery following MI. Methods and Results: Epicardial Infarct Repair (EIR), a novel bio-surgical procedure where a healthy ECM-biomaterial (CorMatrix®-ECM®, CorMatrix Cardiovascular Inc., GA, USA) is surgically applied to the epicardial surface of the heart post-MI, was evaluated. In a small animal permanent coronary artery ligation model we demonstrate that animals treated with ECM-biomaterial have improved myocardial function and attenuated LV remodeling compared to shams (ejection fraction (EF): 40.5±7.4% vs. 28.7±13.1%, respectively; p<0.001; LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV): 298.0±63.5μL vs. 373.7±78.8μL, respectively; p<0.0001). In order to determine whether this was the result of recovery of the infarcted myocardium or enhanced compensation by the remote myocardium we employed a large animal preclinical ischemia-reperfusion model and evaluated regional cardiac function by MRI demonstrating functional recovery of the infarcted myocardial territory, specifically infarcted myocardium otherwise defined as non-viable with reperfusion alone (change in regional myocardial contraction at 6-weeks: reperfusion+EIR: 28.6±14.0% vs. reperfusion alone: 4.2±13.5% wall thickening; p<0.05). In order to determine whether these structural and functional improvements are the consequence of passive biomechanical restraint or an active bio-inductive mechanism we compared EIR with active ECM-biomaterial versus inactivated (gluteraldehyde-fixed) ECM-biomaterial using our small animal permanent coronary artery ligation model. Animals treated with active ECM-biomaterial demonstrate improved cardiac function and attenuated structural remodeling when compared to inactivated ECM-biomaterial treated animals (EF: 40.5±7.4% vs. 32.7±9.3 %, respectively; p<0.001; LVEDV: 298.0±63.5μL vs. 341.2±48.4 μL, respectively; p<0.0001) as well as evidence of an active bio-inductive mechanism involving vasculogenesis. Conclusion: EIR with ECM-biomaterial attenuates adverse structural remodeling and improves functional recovery following MI through a bio-inductive mechanism involving vasculogenesis, demonstrating that healthy ECM biology can be leveraged to successfully treat MI.