Browsing by Author "Offringa, Martin"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of multi-dose oral ondansetron for pediatric gastroenteritis (the DOSE-AGE study): statistical analysis plan
    (2020-08-24) Heath, Anna; Rios, Juan David; Williamson-Urquhart, Sarah; Pechlivanoglou, Petros; Offringa, Martin; McCabe, Christopher; Hopkin, Gareth; Plint, Amy C; Dixon, Andrew; Beer, Darcy; Gouin, Serge; Joubert, Gary; Klassen, Terry P; Freedman, Stephen B
    Abstract Background Acute gastroenteritis is a leading cause of emergency department visits and hospitalizations among children in North America. Oral-rehydration therapy is recommended for children with mild-to-moderate dehydration, but children who present with vomiting are frequently offered intravenous rehydration in the emergency department (ED). Recent studies have demonstrated that the anti-emetic ondansetron can reduce vomiting, intravenous rehydration, and hospitalization when administered in the ED to children with dehydration. However, there is little evidence of additional benefit from prescribing ondansetron beyond the initial ED dose. Moreover, repeat dosing may increase the frequency of diarrhea. Despite the lack of evidence and potential adverse side effects, many physicians across North America provide multiple doses of ondansetron to be taken following ED disposition. Thus, the Multi-Dose Oral Ondansetron for Pediatric Gastroenteritis (DOSE-AGE) trial will evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing multiple doses of ondansetron to treat acute gastroenteritis-associated vomiting. This article specifies the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the DOSE-AGE trial and was submitted before the outcomes of the study were available for analysis. Methods/design The DOSE-AGE study is a phase III, 6-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel design randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether participants who are prescribed multiple doses of oral ondansetron to administer, as needed, following their ED visit have a lower incidence of experiencing moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis, as measured by the Modified Vesikari Scale score, compared with a placebo. To assess safety, the DOSE-AGE trial will investigate the frequency and maximum number of diarrheal episodes following ED disposition, and the occurrence of palpitations, pre-syncope/syncope, chest pain, arrhythmias, and serious adverse events. For the secondary outcomes, the DOSE-AGE trial will investigate the individual elements of the Modified Vesikari Scale score and caregiver satisfaction with the therapy. Discussion The DOSE-AGE trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of multiple doses of oral ondansetron, taken as needed, following an initial ED dose in children with acute gastroenteritis-associated vomiting. The data from the DOSE-AGE trial will be analyzed using this SAP. This will reduce the risk of producing data-driven results and bias in our reported outcomes. The DOSE-AGE study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on February 22, 2019. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03851835 . Registered on 22 February 2019.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Adaptive designs in clinical trials: a systematic review-part I
    (2024-10-04) Ben-Eltriki, Mohamed; Rafiq, Aisha; Paul, Arun; Prabhu, Devashree; Afolabi, Michael O. S.; Baslhaw, Robert; Neilson, Christine J.; Driedger, Michelle; Mahmud, Salaheddin M.; Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry; Marlin, Susan; Offringa, Martin; Butcher, Nancy; Heath, Anna; Kelly, Lauren E.
    Abstract Background Adaptive designs (ADs) are intended to make clinical trials more flexible, offering efficiency and potentially cost-saving benefits. Despite a large number of statistical methods in the literature on different adaptations to trials, the characteristics, advantages and limitations of such designs remain unfamiliar to large parts of the clinical and research community. This systematic review provides an overview of the use of ADs in published clinical trials (Part I). A follow-up (Part II) will compare the application of AD in trials in adult and pediatric studies, to provide real-world examples and recommendations for the child health community. Methods Published studies from 2010 to April 2020 were searched in the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid). Clinical trial protocols, reports, and a secondary analyses using AD were included. We excluded trial registrations and interventions other than drugs or vaccines to align with regulatory guidance. Data from the published literature on study characteristics, types of adaptations, statistical analysis, stopping boundaries, logistical challenges, operational considerations and ethical considerations were extracted and summarized herein. Results Out of 23,886 retrieved studies, 317 publications of adaptive trials, 267 (84.2%) trial reports, and 50 (15.8%) study protocols), were included. The most frequent disease was oncology (168/317, 53%). Most trials included only adult participants (265, 83.9%),16 trials (5.4%) were limited to only children and 28 (8.9%) were for both children and adults, 8 trials did not report the ages of the included populations. Some studies reported using more than one adaptation (there were 390 reported adaptations in 317 clinical trial reports). Most trials were early in drug development (phase I, II (276/317, 87%). Dose-finding designs were used in the highest proportion of the included trials (121/317, 38.2 %). Adaptive randomization (53/317, 16.7%), with drop-the-losers (or pick-the-winner) designs specifically reported in 29 trials (9.1%) and seamless phase 2-3 design was reported in 27 trials (8.5%). Continual reassessment methods (60/317, 18.9%) and group sequential design (47/317, 14.8%) were also reported. Approximately two-thirds of trials used frequentist statistical methods (203/309, 64%), while Bayesian methods were reported in 24% (75/309) of included trials. Conclusion This review provides a comprehensive report of methodological features in adaptive clinical trials reported between 2010 and 2020. Adaptation details were not uniformly reported, creating limitations in interpretation and generalizability. Nevertheless, implementation of existing reporting guidelines on ADs and the development of novel educational strategies that address the scientific, operational challenges and ethical considerations can help in the clinical trial community to decide on when and how to implement ADs in clinical trials. Study protocol registration https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2934-7 .
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Assessing the quality and value of metabolic chart data for capturing core outcomes for pediatric medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency
    (2024-01-13) Iverson, Ryan; Taljaard, Monica; Geraghty, Michael T.; Pugliese, Michael; Tingley, Kylie; Coyle, Doug; Kronick, Jonathan B.; Wilson, Kumanan; Austin, Valerie; Brunel-Guitton, Catherine; Buhas, Daniela; Butcher, Nancy J.; Chan, Alicia K. J.; Dyack, Sarah; Goobie, Sharan; Greenberg, Cheryl R.; Jain-Ghai, Shailly; Inbar-Feigenberg, Michal; Karp, Natalya; Kozenko, Mariya; Langley, Erica; Lines, Matthew; Little, Julian; MacKenzie, Jennifer; Maranda, Bruno; Mercimek-Andrews, Saadet; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Mitchell, John J.; Nagy, Laura; Offringa, Martin; Pender, Amy; Potter, Murray; Prasad, Chitra; Ratko, Suzanne; Salvarinova, Ramona; Schulze, Andreas; Siriwardena, Komudi; Sondheimer, Neal; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler-Ipsiroglu, Sylvia; Tapscott, Kendra; Trakadis, Yannis; Turner, Lesley; Van Karnebeek, Clara; Vandersteen, Anthony; Walia, Jagdeep S.; Wilson, Brenda J.; Yu, Andrea C.; Potter, Beth K.; Chakraborty, Pranesh
    Abstract Background Generating rigorous evidence to inform care for rare diseases requires reliable, sustainable, and longitudinal measurement of priority outcomes. Having developed a core outcome set for pediatric medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency, we aimed to assess the feasibility of prospective measurement of these core outcomes during routine metabolic clinic visits. Methods We used existing cohort data abstracted from charts of 124 children diagnosed with MCAD deficiency who participated in a Canadian study which collected data from birth to a maximum of 11 years of age to investigate the frequency of clinic visits and quality of metabolic chart data for selected outcomes. We recorded all opportunities to collect outcomes from the medical chart as a function of visit rate to the metabolic clinic, by treatment centre and by child age. We applied a data quality framework to evaluate data based on completeness, conformance, and plausibility for four core MCAD outcomes: emergency department use, fasting time, metabolic decompensation, and death. Results The frequency of metabolic clinic visits decreased with increasing age, from a rate of 2.8 visits per child per year (95% confidence interval, 2.3–3.3) among infants 2 to 6 months, to 1.0 visit per child per year (95% confidence interval, 0.9–1.2) among those ≥ 5 years of age. Rates of emergency department visits followed anticipated trends by child age. Supplemental findings suggested that some emergency visits occur outside of the metabolic care treatment centre but are not captured. Recommended fasting times were updated relatively infrequently in patients’ metabolic charts. Episodes of metabolic decompensation were identifiable but required an operational definition based on acute manifestations most commonly recorded in the metabolic chart. Deaths occurred rarely in these patients and quality of mortality data was not evaluated. Conclusions Opportunities to record core outcomes at the metabolic clinic occur at least annually for children with MCAD deficiency. Methods to comprehensively capture emergency care received at outside institutions are needed. To reduce substantial heterogeneous recording of core outcome across treatment centres, improved documentation standards are required for recording of recommended fasting times and a consensus definition for metabolic decompensations needs to be developed and implemented.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Correction to: Establishing a core outcome set for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) in children: study protocol for a rapid literature review, candidate outcomes survey, and Delphi surveys
    (2021-12-09) Howie, Alison H.; Tingley, Kylie; Inbar-Feigenberg, Michal; Mitchell, John J.; Butcher, Nancy J.; Offringa, Martin; Smith, Maureen; Angel, Kim; Gentle, Jenifer; Wyatt, Alexandra; Campeau, Philippe M.; Chan, Alicia; Chakraborty, Pranesh; El Turk, Farah; Mamak, Eva; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Skidmore, Becky; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler, Sylvia; Potter, Beth K.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Establishing a core outcome set for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) in children: study protocol for a rapid literature review, candidate outcomes survey, and Delphi surveys
    (2021-11-17) Howie, Alison H.; Tingley, Kylie; Inbar-Feigenberg, Michal; Mitchell, John J.; Butcher, Nancy J.; Offringa, Martin; Smith, Maureen; Angel, Kim; Gentle, Jenifer; Wyatt, Alexandra; Campeau, Philippe M.; Chan, Alicia; Chakraborty, Pranesh; El Turk, Farah; Mamak, Eva; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Skidmore, Becky; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler, Sylvia; Potter, Beth K.
    Abstract Background Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of inherited metabolic diseases characterized by chronic, progressive multi-system manifestations with varying degrees of severity. Disease-modifying therapies exist to treat some types of MPS; however, they are not curative, underscoring the need to identify and evaluate co-interventions that optimize functioning, participation in preferred activities, and quality of life. A Canadian pediatric MPS registry is under development and may serve as a platform to launch randomized controlled trials to evaluate such interventions. To promote the standardized collection of patient/family-reported and clinical outcomes considered important to patients/families, health care providers (HCPs), and policymakers, the choice of outcomes to include in the registry will be informed by a core outcome set (COS). We aim to establish a patient-oriented COS for pediatric MPS using a multi-stakeholder approach. Methods In step 1 of the six-step process to develop the COS, we will identify relevant outcomes through a rapid literature review and candidate outcomes survey. A two-phase screening approach will be implemented to identify eligible publications, followed by extraction of outcomes and other pre-specified data elements. Simultaneously, we will conduct a candidate outcomes survey with children with MPS and their families to identify outcomes most important to them. In step 2, HCPs experienced in treating patients with MPS will be invited to review the list of outcomes generated in step 1 and identify additional clinically relevant outcomes. We will then ask patients/families, HCPs, and policymakers to rate the outcomes in a set of Delphi Surveys (step 3), and to participate in a subsequent consensus meeting to finalize the COS (step 4). Step 5 involves establishing a set of outcome measurement instruments for the COS. Finally, we will disseminate the COS to knowledge users (step 6). Discussion The proposed COS will inform the choice of outcomes to include in the MPS registry and, more broadly, promote the standardized collection of patient-oriented outcomes for pediatric MPS research. By involving patients/families from the earliest stage of the research, we will ensure that the COS will be relevant to those who will ultimately benefit from the research. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42021267531 , COMET
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Establishing core outcome sets for phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency in children: study protocol for systematic reviews and Delphi surveys
    (2017-12-19) Potter, Beth K; Hutton, Brian; Clifford, Tammy J; Pallone, Nicole; Smith, Maureen; Stockler, Sylvia; Chakraborty, Pranesh; Barbeau, Pauline; Garritty, Chantelle M; Pugliese, Michael; Rahman, Alvi; Skidmore, Becky; Tessier, Laure; Tingley, Kylie; Coyle, Doug; Greenberg, Cheryl R; Korngut, Lawrence; MacKenzie, Alex; Mitchell, John J; Nicholls, Stuart; Offringa, Martin; Schulze, Andreas; Taljaard, Monica
    Abstract Background Inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) are a large group of rare single-gene disorders that are typically diagnosed early in life. There are important evidence gaps related to the comparative effectiveness of therapies for IMD, which are in part due to challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for rare diseases. Registry-based RCTs present a unique opportunity to address these challenges provided the registries implement standardized collection of outcomes that are important to patients and their caregivers and to clinical providers and healthcare systems. Currently there is no core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for paediatric IMD. This protocol outlines a study that will establish COS for each of two relatively common IMD in children, phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency. Methods This two-part study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. Part 1 includes a rapid review and development of an evidence map to identify a comprehensive listing of outcomes reported in past studies of PKU and MCAD deficiency. The review follows established methods for knowledge synthesis, including a comprehensive search strategy, two stages of screening citations against inclusion/exclusion criteria by two reviewers working independently, and extraction of important data elements from eligible studies, including details of the outcomes collected and outcome measurement instruments. The review findings will inform part 2 of our study, a set of Delphi surveys to establish consensus on the highest priority outcomes for each condition. Healthcare providers, families of children with PKU or MCAD deficiency, and health system decision-makers will be invited to participate in two to three rounds of Delphi surveys. The design of the surveys will involve parents of children with IMD who are part of a family advisory forum. Discussion This protocol is a crucial step in developing the capacity to launch RCTs with meaningful outcomes that address comparative effectiveness questions in the field of paediatric IMD. Such trials will contribute high-quality evidence to inform decision-making by patients and their family members, clinicians, and policy-makers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Outcomes in pediatric studies of medium-chain acyl-coA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and phenylketonuria (PKU): a review
    (2020-01-14) Pugliese, Michael; Tingley, Kylie; Chow, Andrea; Pallone, Nicole; Smith, Maureen; Rahman, Alvi; Chakraborty, Pranesh; Geraghty, Michael T; Irwin, Julie; Tessier, Laure; Nicholls, Stuart G; Offringa, Martin; Butcher, Nancy J; Iverson, Ryan; Clifford, Tammy J; Stockler, Sylvia; Hutton, Brian; Paik, Karen; Tao, Jessica; Skidmore, Becky; Coyle, Doug; Duddy, Kathleen; Dyack, Sarah; Greenberg, Cheryl R; Ghai, Shailly J; Karp, Natalya; Korngut, Lawrence; Kronick, Jonathan; MacKenzie, Alex; MacKenzie, Jennifer; Maranda, Bruno; Mitchell, John J; Potter, Murray; Prasad, Chitra; Schulze, Andreas; Sparkes, Rebecca; Taljaard, Monica; Trakadis, Yannis; Walia, Jagdeep; Potter, Beth K
    Abstract Background Inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) are a group of individually rare single-gene diseases. For many IMDs, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence that evaluates the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Clinical effectiveness trials of IMD interventions could be supported through the development of core outcome sets (COSs), a recommended minimum set of standardized, high-quality outcomes and associated outcome measurement instruments to be incorporated by all trials in an area of study. We began the process of establishing pediatric COSs for two IMDs, medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and phenylketonuria (PKU), by reviewing published literature to describe outcomes reported by authors, identify heterogeneity in outcomes across studies, and assemble a candidate list of outcomes. Methods We used a comprehensive search strategy to identify primary studies and guidelines relevant to children with MCAD deficiency and PKU, extracting study characteristics and outcome information from eligible studies including outcome measurement instruments for select outcomes. Informed by an established framework and a previously published pediatric COS, outcomes were grouped into five, mutually-exclusive, a priori core areas: growth and development, life impact, pathophysiological manifestations, resource use, and death. Results For MCAD deficiency, we identified 83 outcomes from 52 articles. The most frequently represented core area was pathophysiological manifestations, with 33 outcomes reported in 29/52 articles (56%). Death was the most frequently reported outcome. One-third of outcomes were reported by a single study. The most diversely measured outcome was cognition and intelligence/IQ for which eight unique measurement instruments were reported among 14 articles. For PKU, we identified 97 outcomes from 343 articles. The most frequently represented core area was pathophysiological manifestations with 31 outcomes reported in 281/343 articles (82%). Phenylalanine concentration was the most frequently reported outcome. Sixteen percent of outcomes were reported by a single study. Similar to MCAD deficiency, the most diversely measured PKU outcome was cognition and intelligence/IQ with 39 different instruments reported among 82 articles. Conclusions Heterogeneity of reported outcomes and outcome measurement instruments across published studies for both MCAD deficiency and PKU highlights the need for COSs for these diseases, to promote the use of meaningful outcomes and facilitate comparisons across studies.