Browsing by Author "Reva, Viktor"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines
    (2019-12-11) Coccolini, Federico; Kobayashi, Leslie; Kluger, Yoram; Moore, Ernest E; Ansaloni, Luca; Biffl, Walt; Leppaniemi, Ari; Augustin, Goran; Reva, Viktor; Wani, Imitiaz; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Cicuttin, Enrico; Fraga, Gustavo P; Ordonez, Carlos; Pikoulis, Emmanuil; Sibilla, Maria G; Maier, Ron; Matsumura, Yosuke; Masiakos, Peter T; Khokha, Vladimir; Mefire, Alain C; Ivatury, Rao; Favi, Francesco; Manchev, Vassil; Sartelli, Massimo; Machado, Fernando; Matsumoto, Junichi; Chiarugi, Massimo; Arvieux, Catherine; Catena, Fausto; Coimbra, Raul
    Abstract Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree injuries are rare in both adult and pediatric trauma patients, and due to their anatomical location, associated injuries are very common. Mortality is primarily related to associated injuries, but morbidity remains high even in isolated injuries. Optimal management of duodeno-bilio-pancreatic injuries is dictated primarily by hemodynamic stability, clinical presentation, and grade of injury. Endoscopic and percutaneous interventions have increased the ability to non-operatively manage these injuries. Late diagnosis and treatment are both associated to increased morbidity and mortality. Sequelae of late presentations of pancreatic injury and complications of severe pancreatic trauma are also increasingly addressed endoscopically and with interventional radiology procedures. However, for moderate and severe extrahepatic biliary and severe duodeno-pancreatic injuries, immediate operative intervention is preferred as associated injuries are frequent and commonly present with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) duodenal, pancreatic, and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma management guidelines.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Kidney and uro-trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines
    (2019-12-02) Coccolini, Federico; Moore, Ernest E; Kluger, Yoram; Biffl, Walter; Leppaniemi, Ari; Matsumura, Yosuke; Kim, Fernando; Peitzman, Andrew B; Fraga, Gustavo P; Sartelli, Massimo; Ansaloni, Luca; Augustin, Goran; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Wani, Imitiaz; Weber, Dieter; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Larrea, Martha; Arvieux, Catherine; Manchev, Vassil; Reva, Viktor; Coimbra, Raul; Khokha, Vladimir; Mefire, Alain C; Ordonez, Carlos; Chiarugi, Massimo; Machado, Fernando; Sakakushev, Boris; Matsumoto, Junichi; Maier, Ron; di Carlo, Isidoro; Catena, Fausto
    Abstract Renal and urogenital injuries occur in approximately 10-20% of abdominal trauma in adults and children. Optimal management should take into consideration the anatomic injury, the hemodynamic status, and the associated injuries. The management of urogenital trauma aims to restore homeostasis and normal physiology especially in pediatric patients where non-operative management is considered the gold standard. As with all traumatic conditions, the management of urogenital trauma should be multidisciplinary including urologists, interventional radiologists, and trauma surgeons, as well as emergency and ICU physicians. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) kidney and urogenital trauma management guidelines.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines
    (2023-07-21) Coccolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Sawyer, Robert; Rasa, Kemal; Viaggi, Bruno; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Soreide, Kjetil; Hardcastle, Timothy; Gupta, Deepak; Bendinelli, Cino; Ceresoli, Marco; Shelat, Vishal G.; Broek, Richard t.; Baiocchi, Gian L.; Moore, Ernest E.; Sall, Ibrahima; Podda, Mauro; Bonavina, Luigi; Kryvoruchko, Igor A.; Stahel, Philip; Inaba, Kenji; Montravers, Philippe; Sakakushev, Boris; Sganga, Gabriele; Ballestracci, Paolo; Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.; Vincent, Jean-Louis; Pikoulis, Manos; Beka, Solomon G.; Doklestic, Krstina; Chiarugi, Massimo; Falcone, Marco; Bignami, Elena; Reva, Viktor; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Di Saverio, Salomone; Tolonen, Matti; Navsaria, Pradeep; Bala, Miklosh; Balogh, Zsolt; Litvin, Andrey; Hecker, Andreas; Wani, Imtiaz; Fette, Andreas; De Simone, Belinda; Ivatury, Rao; Picetti, Edoardo; Khokha, Vladimir; Tan, Edward; Ball, Chad; Tascini, Carlo; Cui, Yunfeng; Coimbra, Raul; Kelly, Michael; Martino, Costanza; Agnoletti, Vanni; Boermeester, Marja A.; Deā€™Angelis, Nicola; Chirica, Mircea; Biffl, Walt L.; Ansaloni, Luca; Kluger, Yoram; Catena, Fausto; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.
    Abstract Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients
    (2017-08-18) Coccolini, Federico; Montori, Giulia; Catena, Fausto; Kluger, Yoram; Biffl, Walter; Moore, Ernest E; Reva, Viktor; Bing, Camilla; Bala, Miklosh; Fugazzola, Paola; Bahouth, Hany; Marzi, Ingo; Velmahos, George; Ivatury, Rao; Soreide, Kjetil; Horer, Tal; ten Broek, Richard; Pereira, Bruno M; Fraga, Gustavo P; Inaba, Kenji; Kashuk, Joseph; Parry, Neil; Masiakos, Peter T; Mylonas, Konstantinos S; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Gomes, Carlos A; Benatti, Simone V; Naidoo, Noel; Salvetti, Francesco; Maccatrozzo, Stefano; Agnoletti, Vanni; Gamberini, Emiliano; Solaini, Leonardo; Costanzo, Antonio; Celotti, Andrea; Tomasoni, Matteo; Khokha, Vladimir; Arvieux, Catherine; Napolitano, Lena; Handolin, Lauri; Pisano, Michele; Magnone, Stefano; Spain, David A; de Moya, Marc; Davis, Kimberly A; De Angelis, Nicola; Leppaniemi, Ari; Ferrada, Paula; Latifi, Rifat; Navarro, David C; Otomo, Yashuiro; Coimbra, Raul; Maier, Ronald V; Moore, Frederick; Rizoli, Sandro; Sakakushev, Boris; Galante, Joseph M; Chiara, Osvaldo; Cimbanassi, Stefania; Mefire, Alain C; Weber, Dieter; Ceresoli, Marco; Peitzman, Andrew B; Wehlie, Liban; Sartelli, Massimo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Ansaloni, Luca
    Abstract Spleen injuries are among the most frequent trauma-related injuries. At present, they are classified according to the anatomy of the injury. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic derangement, and the associated injuries. The management of splenic trauma patients aims to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology especially considering the modern tools for bleeding management. Thus, the management of splenic trauma should be ultimately multidisciplinary and based on the physiology of the patient, the anatomy of the injury, and the associated lesions. Lastly, as the management of adults and children must be different, children should always be treated in dedicated pediatric trauma centers. In fact, the vast majority of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma can be managed non-operatively. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of splenic trauma and the management guidelines.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation
    (2021-02-23) Coccolini, Federico; Kluger, Yoram; Moore, Ernest E.; Maier, Ronald V.; Coimbra, Raul; OrdoƱez, Carlos; Ivatury, Rao; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.; Biffl, Walter; Sartelli, Massimo; Hecker, Andreas; Ansaloni, Luca; Leppaniemi, Ari; Reva, Viktor; Civil, Ian; Vega, Felipe; Chiarugi, Massimo; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Sakakushev, Boris; Peitzman, Andrew; Chiara, Osvaldo; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Maegele, Marc; Miccoli, Mario; Chirica, Mircea; Khokha, Vladimir; Sugrue, Michael; Fraga, Gustavo P.; Otomo, Yasuhiro; Baiocchi, Gian L.; Catena, Fausto
    Abstract Introduction Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.