Browsing by Author "Rock, Melanie June"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Carving out a place for “pets” within the age-friendly agenda: A case study exploring the public health implications of companion animal relationships for older adults who are aging-in-place
    (2018-01-17) Toohey, Ann Madeline; Rock, Melanie June; Adams, Cindy; Hewson, Jennifer
    Growing numbers of people surpass the age of 65 each year, and a widely adopted response has been to work towards making communities more “age-friendly,” as per the World Health Organization’s age-friendly policy framework. Within this framework, there is no explicit reference to older adults’ relationships with companion animals (“pets”), even as pet-ownership is prevalent among older adults in many countries worldwide. Thus my research aimed to explore, from a socio-ecological perspective, the extent to which growing efforts to promote aging-in-place by adopting an age-friendly policy framework may also be influencing the health-promoting potential of relationships between older adults and their companion animals. To achieve this aim, I conducted an ethnographic multiple case study set in Calgary, Alberta, between November 2014 and October 2016. This approach allowed me to explore these influences at both the national and local population levels. My case study entailed three methodologically distinct, yet conceptually linked, research components: (i) a statistical analysis of associations between social participation and life satisfaction for older pet owners and non-owners participating in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA); (ii) a thematic content analysis of local community-based social support and animal welfare agencies’ experiences of serving older adults with companion animals; and (iii) a dialogical narrative analysis of the housing transition challenges described by lower income older adults who were aging-in-place with a companion animal. In synthesizing the findings of each component, my thesis concludes that companion animal relationships may, in some circumstances, confound efforts to promote age-friendly communities in ways that are equitable. Consideration for companion animals is merited across several domains of age-friendliness. The negative consequences of omitting consideration for older adults’ relationships with companion animals from age-friendly efforts may be unfairly borne by those who are experiencing socio-economic disadvantages and social isolation as they age-in-place. This omission may unintentionally serve to impede the health-promoting benefits of animal companionship later in life. A reversal of this situation could help to contribute to health equity and social justice for the growing numbers of older adults who are aging-in-place, and for their companion animals.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Exploring moral distress amongst veterinarians who care for poor people and their pets in multi-species communities
    (2022-07-07) Rock, Melanie June; Baker, Tessa; Chalhoub, Serge; Van Patten, Kimberly; Adams, Cindy L.
    As a profession, veterinary medicine has ethical and legal obligations towards humankind, not just other species. Even so, investigations into medico-legal borderlands have yet to focus on veterinary expertise. This presentation centers on pop-up free clinics in a partnership between a social-service charity and a veterinary school. Social research has informed this service-learning initiative, from the outset. Most recently, our interdisciplinary team interviewed clients, social-service providers employed by the partnered charity, and qualified veterinarians who have participated as educators. The interview guides provided the foundation for an analytic matrix and team discussions. After that, with periodic input from team members and an emphasis on reflexivity, I led a thematic analysis vis-à-vis relevant scholarship, including previous publications arising from this service-learning initiative. Social-service providers indicated appreciation for the veterinary educators’ commitment to partnership. As for clients, they consistently reported feeling respected and valued at the pop-up free clinic, and they spoke of their pets as family members. Some clients registered concern about the veterinary-service barriers faced by poor people. The veterinarians, meanwhile, expressed profound angst and sorrow, consistent with a concept called “moral distress.” Social researchers, along with social-service providers and policy professionals, should pay more attention to moral distress amongst veterinary-service providers as a social problem. Only then might multi-species publics might become powerful enough to redress the root causes of the ethical quandaries and questioning that can arise from caring for marginalized multi-species families.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access