Browsing by Author "Vanderlee, Lana"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Are stress-related pathways of social status differentiation more important determinants of health inequities in countries with higher levels of income inequality?
    (Foundation for the Sociology of Health and Illness [Associate Organisation], Wiley [Commercial Publisher], 2022-03-08) Olstad, Dana Lee; Nejatinamini, Sara; Vanderlee, Lana; Livingstone, Katherine M; Campbell, David J. T.; Tang, Karen; Minaker, Leia M.; Hammond, David
    We explored socioeconomic gradients in self-rated overall health (SROH) using indicators of materialist (educational attainment and perceived income adequacy) and psychosocial perspectives (subjective social status (SSS)) among adults living in countries with varying levels of income inequality, and the importance of psychosocial stress in mediating these associations. If psychosocial processes at the individual and societal levels correspond, associations between SSS and SROH should be higher among adults in countries with higher income inequality, and psychosocial stress should be a more important mediator of these associations. We used multigroup structural equation models to analyse cross-sectional data from the International Food Policy Study of adults (n = 22,824) in Australia, Canada, Mexico, the UK and the United States. Associations between SSS and SROH were not higher in more unequal countries, nor was psychosocial stress a more important mediator of these associations. Inequities in SROH in more unequal countries may not predominantly reflect stress-related pathways of social status differentiation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Food and beverage manufacturing and retailing company policies and commitments to improve the healthfulness of Canadian food environments
    (2024-09-05) Gaucher-Holm, Alexa; Chan, Jasmine; Sacks, Gary; Vaillancourt, Caroline; Vergeer, Laura; Potvin Kent, Monique; Olstad, Dana L.; Vanderlee, Lana
    Abstract Background Food and beverage companies play a central role in shaping the healthfulness of food environments. Methods The BIA-Obesity tool was used to evaluate and benchmark the specificity, comprehensiveness and transparency of the food environment-related policies and commitments of leading food and beverage manufacturing and retailing companies in Canada. Policies and commitments related to the healthfulness of food environments within 6 action areas were assessed: 1) corporate nutrition strategy; 2) product (re)formulation; 3) nutrition information and labelling; 4) product and brand promotion; 5) product accessibility; and 6) disclosure of relationships with external organizations. Data were collected from publicly available sources, and companies were invited to supplement and validate information collected by the research team. Each company was then assigned a score out of 100 for each action area, and an overall BIA-Obesity score out of 100. Results Overall BIA-Obesity scores for manufacturers ranged from 18 to 75 out of 100 (median = 49), while scores for retailers ranged from 21 to 25 (median = 22). Scores were highest within the product (re)formulation (median = 60) followed by the corporate nutrition strategy (median = 59) domain for manufacturers, while retailers performed best within the corporate nutrition strategy (median = 53), followed by the disclosure of relationships with external organizations (median = 47) domain. Companies within both sectors performed worst within the product accessibility domain (medians = 8 and 0 for manufacturers and retailers, respectively). Conclusions This study highlights important limitations to self-regulatory approaches of the food and beverage industry to improve the healthfulness of food environments. Although some companies had specific, comprehensive, and transparent policies and commitments to address the healthfulness of food environments in Canada, most fell short of recommended best-practice. Additional mandatory government policies and regulations may be warranted to effectively transform Canadian food environments to promote healthier diets and prevent related non-communicable diseases.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Food environment research in Canada: a rapid review of methodologies and measures deployed between 2010 and 2021
    (2024-02-19) Vaillancourt, Caroline; Ahmed, Mavra; Kirk, Sara; Labonté, Marie-Ève; Laar, Amos; Mah, Catherine L.; Minaker, Leia; Olstad, Dana L.; Potvin Kent, Monique; Provencher, Véronique; Prowse, Rachel; Raine, Kim D.; Schram, Ashley; Zavala-Mora, Daniela; Rancourt-Bouchard, Maryka; Vanderlee, Lana
    Abstract Numerous research methodologies have been used to examine food environments. Existing reviews synthesizing food environment measures have examined a limited number of domains or settings and none have specifically targeted Canada. This rapid review aimed to 1) map research methodologies and measures that have been used to assess food environments; 2) examine what food environment dimensions and equity related-factors have been assessed; and 3) identify research gaps and priorities to guide future research. A systematic search of primary articles evaluating the Canadian food environment in a real-world setting was conducted. Publications in English or French published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1 2010 and June 17 2021 and indexed in Web of Science, CAB Abstracts and Ovid MEDLINE were considered. The search strategy adapted an internationally-adopted food environment monitoring framework covering 7 domains (Food Marketing; Labelling; Prices; Provision; Composition; Retail; and Trade and Investment). The final sample included 220 articles. Overall, Trade and Investment (1%, n = 2), Labelling (7%, n = 15) and, to a lesser extent, Prices (14%, n = 30) were the least studied domains in Canada. Among Provision articles, healthcare (2%, n = 1) settings were underrepresented compared to school (67%, n = 28) and recreation and sport (24%, n = 10) settings, as was the food service industry (14%, n = 6) compared to grocery stores (86%, n = 36) in the Composition domain. The study identified a vast selection of measures employed in Canada overall and within single domains. Equity-related factors were only examined in half of articles (n = 108), mostly related to Retail (n = 81). A number of gaps remain that prevent a holistic and systems-level analysis of food environments in Canada. As Canada continues to implement policies to improve the quality of food environments in order to improve dietary patterns, targeted research to address identified gaps and harmonize methods across studies will help evaluate policy impact over time.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Stress-Related Poor Diet Quality Does Not Explain Socioeconomic Inequities in Health: A Structural Equation Mediation Analysis of Gender-Specific Pathways
    (Elsevier, 2021-10-07) Olstad, Dana Lee; Nejatinamini, Sara; Kirkpatrick, Sharon I; Vanderlee, Lana; Livingstone, Katherine M; Campbell, David J T; Tang, Karen; Minaker, Leia M; Hammond, David
    Psychosocial stress and diet quality individually mediate associations between socioeconomic position (SEP) and health; however, it is not known whether they jointly mediate these associations. This is an important question because stress-related unhealthy eating is often invoked as an explanation for diet-related health inequities, particularly among women, seemingly with no empirical justification. Objective: This study examined whether psychosocial stress and diet quality jointly mediated associations between SEP and self-rated health in women and men. Design: Multiple mediating pathways were modeled using data from the cross-sectional International Food Policy Study. Participants and setting: Data were collected from 5,645 adults (aged 18 years or older) in Canada during 2018 and 2019. Main outcome measures: Participants reported SEP using indicators of materialist (educational attainment and perceived income adequacy) and psychosocial pathways (subjective social status), along with psychosocial stress, dietary intake (to assess overall diet quality via Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores), and self-rated health. Statistical analyses performed: Structural equation modeling modeled pathways linking SEP (ie, educational attainment, perceived income adequacy, and subjective social status) with self-rated health mediated by psychosocial stress and diet quality, stratified by gender. Results: There was no evidence that psychosocial stress and diet quality jointly mediated associations between SEP and self-rated health in women or men. Diet quality mediated associations between educational attainment and self-rated health in women and men, with some evidence that it mediated associations between subjective social status and self-rated health in men (P = 0.051). Psychosocial stress mediated associations between perceived income adequacy and self-rated health in women and men, and between subjective social status and self-rated health in women. Conclusions: Although often invoked as an explanation for diet-related health inequities, stress-related poor diet quality did not mediate associations between SEP and self-rated health in women or men. Psychosocial stress and diet quality individually mediated some of these associations, with some differences by gender.