Browsing by Author "Wasylak, Tracy"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Beyond surgery: clinical and economic impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs
    (2018-12-29) Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain; Ljungqvist, Olle; Wasylak, Tracy; Peters, Oliver; Demartines, Nicolas
    Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative management based on multimodality and multidisciplinary work. ERAS has been shown to have important clinical and economic benefits, but its spread remains slow worldwide. Discussion This manuscript reviews the overall program benefits and focuses on important aspects for implementation well beyond surgery. Summary Implementation of ERAS pathways improves clinical outcomes and induces substantial economic gains. ERAS is the current surgical revolution.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary
    (2021-05-10) McCarron, Tamara L; Clement, Fiona; Rasiah, Jananee; Moffat, Karen; Wasylak, Tracy; Santana, Maria Jose
    Abstract Background Patient partners can be described as individuals who assume roles as active members on research teams, indicative of individuals with greater involvement, increased sharing of power, and increased responsibility than traditionally described by patient participants who are primarily studied. A gap still remains in the understanding of how to engage patients. The objective of this commentary is to describe the involvement of four patient partners who worked with researchers during a scoping review. Main body We describe approaches to meaningfully engage patient partners in conducting a scoping review. Patient partners were recruited through existing patient networks. Capacity development in the form of the training was provided to these four patient partners. Engagement strategies were co-designed with them to address potential barriers of involvement and acquiring the necessary skills for the successful completion of this scoping review. Conclusion Involving patients partners early in the project established the foundational relationship so patient partners could contribute to their fullest. We witnessed the success of working alongside patient partners as members of the research team with a clear and mutually agreed upon purpose of the engagement in health research activities and how this seemed to contribute to an effective and rewarding experience for both researcher and patient partner.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Contextual factors and mechanisms that influence sustainability: a realist evaluation of two scaled, multi-component interventions
    (2021-11-04) Flynn, Rachel; Mrklas, Kelly; Campbell, Alyson; Wasylak, Tracy; Scott, Shannon D.
    Abstract Background In 2012, Alberta Health Services created Strategic Clinical NetworksTM (SCNs) to develop and implement evidence-informed, clinician-led and team-delivered health system improvement in Alberta, Canada. SCNs have had several provincial successes in improving health outcomes. Little research has been done on the sustainability of these evidence-based implementation efforts. Methods We conducted a qualitative realist evaluation using a case study approach to identify and explain the contextual factors and mechanisms perceived to influence the sustainability of two provincial SCN evidence-based interventions, a delirium intervention for Critical Care and an Appropriate Use of Antipsychotics (AUA) intervention for Senior’s Health. The context (C) + mechanism (M) = outcome (O) configurations (CMOcs) heuristic guided our research. Results We conducted thirty realist interviews in two cases and found four important strategies that facilitated sustainability: Learning collaboratives, audit & feedback, the informal leadership role, and patient stories. These strategies triggered certain mechanisms such as sense-making, understanding value and impact of the intervention, empowerment, and motivation that increased the likelihood of sustainability. For example, informal leaders were often hands-on and influential to front-line staff. Learning collaboratives broke down professional and organizational silos and encouraged collective sharing and learning, motivating participants to continue with the intervention. Continual audit-feedback interventions motivated participants to want to perform and improve on a long-term basis, increasing the likelihood of sustainability of the two multi-component interventions. Patient stories demonstrated the interventions’ impact on patient outcomes, motivating staff to want to continue doing the intervention, and increasing the likelihood of its sustainability. Conclusions This research contributes to the field of implementation science, providing evidence on key strategies for sustainability and the underlying causal mechanisms of these strategies that increases the likelihood of sustainability. Identifying causal mechanisms provides evidence on the processes by which implementation strategies operate and lead to sustainability. Future work is needed to evaluate the impact of informal leadership, learning collaboratives, audit-feedback, and patient stories as strategies for sustainability, to generate better guidance on planning sustainable improvements with long term impact.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography
    (2020-04-19) Manhas, Kiran P; Olson, Karin; Churchill, Katie; Vohra, Sunita; Wasylak, Tracy
    Abstract Background Shared decision-making (SDM) can advance patient satisfaction, understanding, goal fulfilment, and patient-reported outcomes. We lack clarity on whether this physician-focused literature applies to community rehabilitation, and on the integration of SDM policies in healthcare settings. We aimed to understand patient and provider perceptions of shared decision-making (SDM) in community rehabilitation, particularly the barriers and facilitators to SDM. Methods We used a focused ethnography involving 14 community rehabilitation sites across Alberta, including rural, regional-urban and metropolitan-urban sites. We conducted semi-structured interviews that asked participants about their positive and negative communication experiences (n = 23 patients; n = 26 providers). Results We found SDM experiences fluctuated between extremes: Getting Patient Buy-In and Aligning Expectations. The former is provider-driven, prescriptive and less flexible; the latter is collaborative, inquisitive and empowering. In Aligning Expectations, patients and providers express humility and openness, communicate in the language of ask and listen, and view education as empowering. Patients and providers described barriers and facilitators to SDM in community rehabilitation. Facilitators included geography influencing context and connections; consistent, patient-specific messaging; patient lifestyle, capacity and perceived outlook; provider confidence, experience and perceived independence; provider training; and perceptions of more time (and control over time) for appointments. SDM barriers included lack of privacy; waitlists and financial barriers to access; provider approach; how choices are framed; and, patient’s perceived assertiveness, lack of capacity, and level of deference. Conclusions We have found both excellent experiences and areas for improvement for applying SDM in community rehabilitation. We proffer recommendations to advance high-quality SDM in community rehabilitation based on promoting facilitators and overcoming barriers. This research will support the spread, scale and evaluation of a new Model of Care in rehabilitation by the provincial health system, which aimed to promote patient-centred care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a strategy to transform surgical care across a health system
    (2017-05-19) Gramlich, Leah M; Sheppard, Caroline E; Wasylak, Tracy; Gilmour, Loreen E; Ljungqvist, Olle; Basualdo-Hammond, Carlota; Nelson, Gregg
    Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to have a positive impact on outcome. The ERAS care system includes an evidence-based guideline, an implementation program, and an interactive audit system to support practice change. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of the Theoretic Domains Framework (TDF) in changing surgical care and application of the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) model to analyze end-to-end implementation of ERAS in colorectal surgery across multiple sites within a single health system. The ultimate intent of this work is to allow for the development of a model for spread, scale, and sustainability of ERAS in Alberta Health Services (AHS). Methods ERAS for colorectal surgery was implemented at two sites and then spread to four additional sites. The ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS) was used to assess compliance with the guidelines, length of stay, readmissions, and complications. Data sources informing knowledge translation included surveys, focus groups, interviews, and other qualitative data sources such as minutes and status updates. The QUERI model and TDF were used to thematically analyze 189 documents with 2188 quotes meeting the inclusion criteria. Data sources were analyzed for barriers or enablers, organized into a framework that included individual to organization impact, and areas of focus for guideline implementation. Results Compliance with the evidence-based guidelines for ERAS in colorectal surgery at baseline was 40%. Post implementation compliance, consistent with adoption of best practice, improved to 65%. Barriers and enablers were categorized as clinical practice (22%), individual provider (26%), organization (19%), external environment (7%), and patients (25%). In the Alberta context, 26% of barriers and enablers to ERAS implementation occurred at the site and unit levels, with a provider focus 26% of the time, a patient focus 26% of the time, and a system focus 22% of the time. Conclusions Using the ERAS care system and applying the QUERI model and TDF allow for identification of strategies that can support diffusion and sustainment of innovation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery across multiple sites within a health care system.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Moving enhanced recovery after surgery from implementation to sustainability across a health system: a qualitative assessment of leadership perspectives
    (2020-04-26) Gramlich, Leah; Nelson, Gregg; Nelson, Alison; Lagendyk, Laura; Gilmour, Loreen E; Wasylak, Tracy
    Abstract Background Knowledge Translation evidence from health care practitioners and administrators implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care has allowed for the spread and scale of the health care innovation. There is a need to identify at a health system level, what it takes from a leadership perspective to move from implementation to sustainability over time. The purpose of this research was to systematically synthesize feedback from health care leaders to inform further spread, scale and sustainability of ERAS care across a health system. Methods Alberta Health Services (AHS) is the largest Canadian health system with approximately 280,000 surgeries annually at more than 50 surgical sites. In 2013 to 2014, AHS used a structured approach to successfully implement ERAS colorectal guidelines at six sites. Between 2016 and 2018, three of the six sites expanded ERAS to other surgical areas (gynecologic oncology, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy/Whipple’s, and cystectomy). This research was designed to explore and learn from the experiences of health care leaders involved in the AHS ERAS implementation expansion (eg. surgical care unit, hospital site or provincial program) and build on the model for knowledge mobilization develop during implementation. Following informed consent, leaders were interviewed using a structured interview guide. Data were recorded, coded and analyzed qualitatively through a combination of theory-driven immersion and crystallization, and template coding using NVivo 12. Results Forty-four individuals (13 physician leaders, 19 leading clinicians and hospital administrators, and 11 provincial leaders) were interviewed. Themes were identified related to Supportive Environments including resources, data, leadership; Champion and Nurse coordinator role; and Capacity Building through change management, education, and teams. The perception and role of leaders changed through initiation and implementation, spread, and sustainability. Barriers and enablers were thematically aligned relative to outcome assessment, consistency of implementation, ERAS care compliance, and the implementation of multiple guidelines. Conclusions Health care leaders have unique perspectives and approaches to support spread, scale and sustainability of ERAS that are different from site based ERAS teams. These findings inform us what leaders need to do or need to do differently to support implementation and to foster spread, scale and sustainability of ERAS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The Need, Value and Affordability of First-line Treatments for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in Alberta
    (2024-04-24) Mazzei, Darren Randell; Marshall, Deborah; Whittaker, Jackie; Faris, Peter; Wasylak, Tracy
    Clinical guidelines have recommended exercise and education as first-line treatments for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) for 25 years, but these proven treatments are underused globally. In Alberta, joint replacements are publicly funded. Meanwhile, first-line treatments are funded with private insurance or out-of-pocket which reduces access. We sought to inform the policy-making process in Alberta by addressing three objectives: 1) Describe “usual care” (UC) patterns of education, exercise, weight management, pain medication and other nonsurgical treatments for knee OA in a cohort of people recommended for nonsurgical care by an orthopaedic surgeon; 2) Estimate the real-world incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of a standardized education and exercise therapy program (GLA:D®) compared to usual care for people managing hip and/or knee OA; 3) Estimate the budget impact of funding GLA:D® for people with hip and knee OA waiting for total joint replacement (TJR) consultation in a universal publicly insured healthcare system. We surveyed 250 people over the telephone and found that only 20% of people used treatments consistent with international clinical guidelines during a three-to-six-year period after an orthopaedic surgeon recommended nonsurgical care. Our prospective matched cohort study (GLA:D® n=127, UC n=127) showed that GLA:D® had a positive INMB compared to UC from the Ministry of Health perspective over 12-months. The INMB of GLA:D® was still positive but less certain over a lifetime as well as when out-of-pocket and private insurance costs were considered. Our budget impact analysis model showed that publicly funding GLA:D® for everyone waiting for TJR consultation could be an affordable solution to avoid surgeries, improve equitable access to evidence-based treatments and save more than the program costs. Our research shows that publicly funding GLA:D® would increase use of first-line treatments in Alberta by filling an important care gap, offer more equitable access to evidence-based care, reduce significant out-of-pocket expenses for people living with OA and improve health system performance.