Policies in Canada fail to address disparities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: a content analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAbbaticchio, Angelina
dc.contributor.authorTheodorlis, Madeline
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorMacKay, Crystal
dc.contributor.authorBorkhoff, Cornelia M.
dc.contributor.authorHazlewood, Glen S.
dc.contributor.authorBattistella, Marisa
dc.contributor.authorLofters, Aisha
dc.contributor.authorAhluwalia, Vandana
dc.contributor.authorGagliardi, Anna R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-28T00:04:21Z
dc.date.available2024-04-28T00:04:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-25
dc.date.updated2024-04-28T00:04:21Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Women are disproportionately impacted by osteoarthritis (OA) but less likely than men to access OA care, particularly racialized women. One way to reduce inequities is through policies that can influence healthcare services. We examined how OA-relevant policies in Canada address equitable, person-centred OA care for women. Methods We used content analysis to extract data from English-language OA-relevant documents referred to as policies or other synonymous terms published in 2000 or later identified by searching governmental and other web sites. We used summary statistics to describe policy characteristics, person-centred care using McCormack’s six-domain framework, and mention of OA prevalence, barriers and strategies to improve equitable access to OA care among women. Results We included 14 policies developed from 2004 to 2021. None comprehensively addressed all person-centred care domains, and few addressed individual domains: enable self-management (50%), share decisions (43%), exchange information (29%), respond to emotions (14%), foster a healing relationship (0%) and manage uncertainty (0%). Even when mentioned, content offered little guidance for how to achieve person-centred OA care. Few policies acknowledged greater prevalence of OA among women (36%), older (29%) or Indigenous persons (29%) and those of lower socioeconomic status (14%); or barriers to OA care among those of lower socioeconomic status (50%), in rural areas (43%), of older age (37%) or ethno-cultural groups (21%), or women (21%). Four (29%) policies recommended strategies for improving access to OA care at the patient (self-management education material in different languages and tailored to cultural norms), clinician (healthcare professional education) and system level (evaluate OA service equity, engage lay health leaders in delivering self-management programs, and offer self-management programs in a variety of formats). Five (36%) policies recommended research on how to improve OA care for equity-seeking groups. Conclusions Canadian OA-relevant policies lack guidance to overcome disparities in access to person-centred OA care for equity-seeking groups including women. This study identified several ways to strengthen policies. Ongoing research must identify the needs and preferences of equity-seeking persons with OA, and evaluate the impact of various models of service delivery, knowledge needed to influence OA-relevant policy.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):522
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10966-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/118571
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/43413
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titlePolicies in Canada fail to address disparities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: a content analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12913_2024_Article_10966.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications