Tipping the scales of conflict: defence policy decision-making in the Canadian federal cabinet
Date
2012
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This dissertation analyzes how the Government of Canada makes decisions to deploy its forces to international conflicts through an examination of the 1996 Zaire peacekeeping mission, the 1999 Kosovo Air War, the 200 I and 2003 deployments to Afghanistan, and the 2003 Iraq War. Although studies of defence policy decisions are common in the United States (US), research on how the Government of Canada decides to go to war has received very little attention in academic literature. In an effort to help address this gap, this study engages two questions: how does the Canadian government decide to go to war? In addition, which influential factor(s) best explain Canadian defence policy decisions towards going to war? Through an in depth analysis of the decision-making process in each case, the dissertation argues that interdepartmental politics, the US, and international organizations, particularly North Atlantic Treaty Organization, play an important role in the decisions that Canada makes to deploy its forces.
Description
Bibliography: p. 396-430
Includes copy of ethics approvals. Original copies with original Partial Copyright Licence.
Includes copy of ethics approvals. Original copies with original Partial Copyright Licence.
Keywords
Citation
Fitzsimmons, D. P. (2012). Tipping the scales of conflict: defence policy decision-making in the Canadian federal cabinet (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/4775