Adverse events associated with administration of vasopressor medications through a peripheral intravenous catheter: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Owen, Victoria S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rosgen, Brianna K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cherak, Stephana J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ferland, Andre | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stelfox, Henry T | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fiest, Kirsten M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Niven, Daniel J | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-18T00:02:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-18T00:02:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-16 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-04-18T00:02:42Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background It is unclear whether vasopressors can be safely administered through a peripheral intravenous (PIV). Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology was used to examine the incidence of local anatomic adverse events associated with PIV vasopressor administration in patients of any age cared for in any acute care environment. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched without restriction from inception to October 2019. References of included studies and related reviews, as well as relevant conference proceedings were also searched. Studies were included if they were: (1) cohort, quasi-experimental, or randomized controlled trial study design; (2) conducted in humans of any age or clinical setting; and (3) reported on local anatomic adverse events associated with PIV vasopressor administration. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials or the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies where appropriate. Incidence estimates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results Twenty-three studies were included in the systematic review, of which 16 and 7 described adults and children, respectively. Meta-analysis from 11 adult studies including 16,055 patients demonstrated a pooled incidence proportion of adverse events associated with PIV vasopressor administration as 1.8% (95% CI 0.1–4.8%, I2 = 93.7%). In children, meta-analysis from four studies and 388 patients demonstrated a pooled incidence proportion of adverse events as 3.3% (95% CI 0.0–10.1%, I2 = 82.4%). Subgroup analyses did not detect any statistically significant effects associated with stratification based on differences in clinical location, risk of bias or design between studies, PIV location and size, or vasopressor type or duration. Most studies had high or some concern for risk of bias. Conclusion The incidence of adverse events associated with PIV vasopressor administration is low. Additional research is required to examine the effects of PIV location and size, vasopressor type and dose, and patient characteristics on the safety of PIV vasopressor administration. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Critical Care. 2021 Apr 16;25(1):146 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03553-1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113265 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44792 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Adverse events associated with administration of vasopressor medications through a peripheral intravenous catheter: a systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |