Key stakeholders’ views on the quality of care and services available to frail seniors in Canada

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGiguere, Anik M C
dc.contributor.authorFarmanova, Elina
dc.contributor.authorHolroyd-Leduc, Jayna M
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon E
dc.contributor.authorUrquhart, Robin
dc.contributor.authorCarnovale, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorBreton, Erik
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Selynne
dc.contributor.authorMaharaj, Nandini
dc.contributor.authorDurand, Pierre J
dc.contributor.authorLégaré, France
dc.contributor.authorTurgeon, Alexis F
dc.contributor.authorAubin, Michèle
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-02T01:02:13Z
dc.date.available2018-12-02T01:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-26
dc.date.updated2018-12-02T01:02:13Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Frail seniors often receive ineffective care, which does not meet their needs. It is still unclear how healthcare systems should be redesigned to be more sensitive to the needs and values of frail seniors and their caregivers. We thus aimed to describe key stakeholders’ perspectives on the current healthcare and services available to frail seniors. Methods In this qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 42 frail seniors, caregivers, clinicians, or healthcare administrators/decision makers involved in frail senior care from five Canadian provinces. We explored participants’ perspectives on the quality of care and services for frail seniors. We used an inductive/deductive thematic data analysis approach based on the Square-of-Care model, including emerging themes using the constant comparison method. Results We grouped participants’ perspectives into strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for improvement, and then into nine themes: care processes, continuity of care, social frailty, access to healthcare and services, models of healthcare delivery, cost of care, healthcare staff management and professional development of healthcare providers, material resources and environmental design of healthcare facilities, and coordination of care. Our findings suggest redesigning assessment, communication with frail seniors and their caregivers, targeting care and services to the needs, and integrating care better across settings and in time. Conclusions A systematic identification of frail older people is the first step to adapt healthcare systems to this population’s needs. Participation of frail older people and their caregivers to decision making would also allow choosing care plans meeting their care goals. The integration of care and services across settings, over time, and with various providers, is also needed to meet frail senior needs.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):290
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0969-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/109204
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44926
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.titleKey stakeholders’ views on the quality of care and services available to frail seniors in Canada
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12877_2018_Article_969.pdf
Size:
993.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications