Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review
| dc.contributor.author | Wingert, Aireen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Cydney | |
| dc.contributor.author | Featherstone, Robin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sebastianski, Meghan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hartling, Lisa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Douglas Wilson, R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-26T10:14:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-26T10:14:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-11-21 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-11-26T10:14:32Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Rates of cesarean deliveries have been increasing, and contributes to the rising number of elective cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies with associated maternal and neonatal risks. Multiple guidelines recommend that women be offered a trial of labor after a cesarean (TOLAC). The objective of the study is to systematically review the literature on adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates. Methods We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Wiley Cochrane Library, CINAHL via EBSCOhost; and Ovid PsycINFO. Additional studies were identified by searching for clinical trial records, conference proceedings and dissertations. Limits were applied for language (English and French) and year of publication (1985 to present). Two reviewers independently screened comparative studies (randomized or non-randomized controlled trials, and observational designs) according to a priori eligibility criteria: women with prior cesarean sections; any adjunct clinical intervention or exposure intended to increase the VBAC rate; any comparator; and, outcomes reporting changes in TOLAC or VBAC rates. One reviewer extracted data and a second reviewer verified for accuracy. Two reviewers independently conducted methodological quality assessments using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results Twenty-three studies of overall moderate to good methodological quality examined adjunct clinical interventions affecting TOLAC and/or VBAC rates: system-level interventions (three studies), provider-level interventions (three studies), guidelines or information for providers (seven studies), provider characteristics (four studies), and patient-level interventions (six studies). Provider-level interventions (opinion leader education, laborist, and obstetrician second opinion for cesarean sections) and provider characteristics (midwifery antenatal care, physicians on night float call schedules, and deliveries by family physicians) were associated with increased rates of VBAC. Few studies employing heterogeneous designs, sample sizes, interventions and comparators limited confidence in the effects. Studies of system-level and patient-level interventions, and guidelines/information for providers reported mixed findings. Conclusions Limited evidence indicates some provider-level interventions and provider characteristics may increase rates of attempted and successful TOLACs and/or VBACs, whereas other adjunct clinical interventions such as system-level interventions, patient-level interventions, and guidelines/information for healthcare providers show mixed findings. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):452 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2065-x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/109194 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44975 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |