Engaging with patients in research on knowledge translation/implementation science methods: a self study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Martha L. P.
dc.contributor.authorLeese, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorGarraway, Leana
dc.contributor.authorOelke, Nelly D.
dc.contributor.authorMunro, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Sacha
dc.contributor.authorHoens, Alison M.
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Sunny
dc.contributor.authorValdovinos, Ana
dc.contributor.authorWick, Ursula
dc.contributor.authorZimmer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorLi, Linda C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-14T00:03:53Z
dc.date.available2022-08-14T00:03:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-08
dc.date.updated2022-08-14T00:03:52Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background In 2017, the British Columbia (Canada) SUPPORT (SUpport for People and Patient-Oriented Research) Unit created six methods clusters to advance methodologies in patient and public oriented research (POR). The knowledge translation (KT)/implementation science methods cluster identified that although there was guidance about how to involve patients and public members in POR research generally, little was known about how best to involve patients and public members on teams specifically exploring POR KT/implementation science methodologies. The purpose of this self-study was to explore what it means to engage patients and the public in studies of POR methods through the reflections of members of five KT/implementation science teams. Methods Informed by a collaborative action research approach, this quality improvement self-study focused on reflection within four KT/implementation science research teams in 2020–2021. The self-study included two rounds of individual interviews with 18 members across four teams. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach followed by a structured discussion of preliminary findings with the research teams. Subsequently, through two small group discussion sessions, the patients/public members from the teams refined the findings. Results Undertaking research on POR KT/implementation science methodologies typically requires teams to work with the uncertainty of exploratory and processual research approaches, make good matches between patients/public members and the team, work intentionally yet flexibly, and be attuned to the external context and its influences on the team. POR methodological research teams need to consider that patients/public members bring their life experiences and world views to the research project. They become researchers in their own right. Individual and team reflection allows teams to become aware of team needs, acknowledge team members’ vulnerabilities, gain greater sensitivity, and enhance communication. Conclusions The iterative self-study process provided research team members with opportunities for reflection and new understanding. Working with patients/public team members as co-researchers opens up new ways of understanding important aspects of research methodologies, which may influence future KT/implementation science research approaches.
dc.description.abstractPlain English summary In this self-study we aimed to understand how members of research teams work together. We explored how research teams included patients and public members in studying research approaches (methods) that support the creation, sharing, and use of research results that matter to patients and the public (patient and public-oriented research). We analyzed interviews with 18 members of 4 teams and discussed the findings with each team. We then further refined the results and their interpretation with patients/public team members. We found that research teams had to deal with the uncertainty that is common for this type of research, which is often exploratory and focuses on processes. There needed to be a good match between patient/public members, the topic, and the team. Teams had to be flexible in how they worked together and they needed to address how power was shared within the team. Finally, the teams were affected by world events such as COVID and social unrest. Research team members had a chance to reflect and gain new understandings through the self-study. A key learning was that patients and public members bring their life experiences and world views to the project. They become researchers in their own right. When team members have a chance to reflect they can become more aware of their own and others’ talents, needs, and vulnerabilities, that awareness can help improve communication and teamwork. Patients and public members as co-researchers can bring new ways of understanding important features of knowledge translation and implementation science research approaches.
dc.identifier.citationResearch Involvement and Engagement. 2022 Aug 08;8(1):41
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00375-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/114988
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45093
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleEngaging with patients in research on knowledge translation/implementation science methods: a self study
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
40900_2022_Article_375.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications