Ontario family physicians’ perspectives about their scope of practice: what is it, what drives it and how does it change?
| dc.contributor.author | Myles, Sophia M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wenghofer, Elizabeth F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ellaway, Rachel H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yeo, Michael T. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-02T00:07:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-02T00:07:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-09-26 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-10-02T00:07:28Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background There is little evidence to show what scope of practice (SOP) means from the point of view of family physicians, how family physicians think about their SOP as it changes over time, or what factors shape and influence their SOP. Understanding family physician perspectives on SOP and the factors that influence it can aid our understanding of how it can constrain and enable physicians’ agency and autonomy in professional practice. Methods Using qualitative description and incorporating constructivist grounded theory data collection and analysis techniques, four focus groups were conducted involving twenty-four Ontario-based family physicians from different contexts, at different career stages, and with different practice experiences. Results Participants’ SOP was highly dynamic, changing throughout their careers due to factors both within and beyond their control. Their sense of their own SOP was the product of a continuous cycle of personal and professional transitions, exposures, and experiences throughout their careers. These family physicians sought regular and sustained mentorship, support, and engagement for their SOP throughout their careers. This was particularly the case during professional transitions and for drivers of their SOP for which they felt unprepared early in their careers, such as through the first years of independent practice, and when functioning as owner-operators of medical practices. Four descriptive themes were identified focusing on the nature of their current practice, their professional preparedness and supports, practice management dynamics, and ‘doctors are people, too’. Conclusions The SOP of the family physicians in this study was dynamic and unique to each individual, it emerged from interactions between their personal and professional lives and identities, and it was embedded in their lived experiences. SOP was also to some extent imposed and externally driven. This study advances understanding by exploring the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of SOP rather than focusing solely on what it is. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Primary Care. 2022 Sep 26;23(1):251 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01833-5 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/115331 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45172 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Ontario family physicians’ perspectives about their scope of practice: what is it, what drives it and how does it change? | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |