Critical care ultrasound training: a survey exploring the “education gap” between potential and reality in Canada

dc.contributor.authorSlemko, Jocelyn M.
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Vijay J.
dc.contributor.authorBagshaw, Sean M.
dc.contributor.authorMa, Irene W. Y.
dc.contributor.authorBrindley, Peter G.
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Brian M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-12T01:03:28Z
dc.date.available2021-12-12T01:03:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-11
dc.date.updated2021-12-12T01:03:27Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) is now a core competency for Canadian critical care medicine (CCM) physicians, but little is known about what education is delivered, how competence is assessed, and what challenges exist. We evaluated the Canadian CCUS education landscape and compared it against published recommendations. Methods A 23-item survey was developed and incorporated a literature review, national recommendations, and expert input. It was sent in the spring of 2019 to all 13 Canadian Adult CCM training programs via their respective program directors. Three months were allowed for data collection and descriptive statistics were compiled. Results Eleven of 13 (85%) programs responded, of which only 7/11 (64%) followed national recommendations. Curricula differed, as did how education was delivered: 8/11 (72%) used hands-on training; 7/11 (64%) used educational rounds; 5/11 (45%) used image interpretation sessions, and 5/11 (45%) used scan-based feedback. All 11 employed academic half-days, but only 7/11 (64%) used experience gained during clinical service. Only 2/11 (18%) delivered multiday courses, and 2/11 (18%) had mandatory ultrasound rotations. Most programs had only 1 or 2 local CCUS expert-champions, and only 4/11 (36%) assessed learner competency. Common barriers included educators receiving insufficient time and/or support. Conclusions Our national survey is the first in Canada to explore CCUS education in critical care. It suggests that while CCUS education is rapidly developing, gaps persist. These include variation in curriculum and delivery, insufficient access to experts, and support for educators.
dc.identifier.citationThe Ultrasound Journal. 2021 Dec 11;13(1):48
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00249-z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/114167
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45250
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleCritical care ultrasound training: a survey exploring the “education gap” between potential and reality in Canada
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13089_2021_Article_249.pdf
Size:
750.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: