Supreme Courts, Photocopiers, and Copyright
dc.contributor.author | Tiessen, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-08T04:45:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-08T04:45:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-26 | |
dc.description.abstract | On the 20th anniversary of CCH, compared the CCH Supreme Court Judgment to its two main international comparitors: Moorhouse (Australia); and William & Wilkins (United States). Compared what happened in the past and what might happen next. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1880/118150 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/42994 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher.faculty | Libraries & Cultural Resources | en |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Calgary | en |
dc.rights | Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | fair dealing | |
dc.subject | copyright | |
dc.subject | CCH | |
dc.subject | Moorhouse | |
dc.subject | William & Wilkins | |
dc.title | Supreme Courts, Photocopiers, and Copyright | |
dc.type | Presentation | |
ucalgary.scholar.level | Faculty |