Designing a framework for primary health care research in Canada: a scoping literature review
| dc.contributor.author | Montesanti, Stephanie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Robinson-Vollman, Ardene | |
| dc.contributor.author | Green, Lee A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-26T11:58:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-09-26T11:58:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-08-29 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-09-26T11:58:51Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Despite significant investments to improve primary health care (PHC) delivery in Canada, provincial health care systems remain fragmented and uncoordinated. Canada’s commitment to strengthening PHC should be driven by robust research and evaluation that reflects our health policy priorities and responds to the needs of the population. One challenge facing health services researchers is developing and sustaining meaningful research priorities and agendas in an overburdened, complex health care system with limited capacity for PHC research and support for clinician researchers. Methods A scoping review of the literature was conducted to examine PHC research priorities in Canada. We compared national research priorities for PHC to research priorities being considered in the province of Alberta. Our scoping review was guided by the following questions: (1) What are the research priorities for PHC in Canada?; and (2) What process is used to identity PHC research priorities? Results Six key theme areas for consideration in setting a PHC research agenda were identified: research in practice, research on practice, research about practice, methods of priority setting, infrastructure, and the intersection of PHC and population/public health. These thematic areas provide a new framework for guiding PHC research in Canada. It was developed to generate best practices and new knowledge (i.e., innovation), transform PHC clinical practice or support quality improvement (i.e., spread), and lead to large-scale health care system transformation (i.e., scale). Conclusions Priority-driven research aims to answer questions of key importance that are likely to have a significant impact on knowledge or practice in the short to medium term. Setting PHC research priorities ensures funded research has the greatest potential population health benefit, that research funding and outputs are aligned with the needs of practitioners and decision makers, and that there is efficient and equitable use of limited resources with less duplication of research effort. Our findings also suggest that a common research priority framework for PHC research in Canada would ensure that research priority-setting exercises are grounded in an evidence-based process. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Family Practice. 2018 Aug 29;19(1):144 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0839-x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/107837 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45649 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | Designing a framework for primary health care research in Canada: a scoping literature review | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |