Are the Risks Real? Contemporary Opposition to the ICC

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorReid, Holly
dc.contributor.authorChapnick, Adam
dc.contributor.editorBrown, Sherri
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T19:26:29Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T19:26:29Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractIn spite of the overwhelming global support for the international criminal court (ICC) upon its inception in July 1998, a significant number of states, led by the US, have hesitated in ratifying the Rome Statute. After reviewing the benefits and drawbacks of a fully­functioning ICC, this paper addresses the implications of the ICC in the context of global power politics. We conclude that, while accession to the ICC indeed affects state sovereignty, on the whole, the risks articulated by opponents in the US and elsewhere are more perceived than real. Accepting the ICC will have little to no impact on Great Power security or influence in the international arena.
dc.identifier.issn1480-6339
dc.identifier.issn1480-6361
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112860
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38455
dc.publisher.departmentPolitical Science
dc.publisher.departmentHistory
dc.publisher.facultyNorman Paterson School of International Affairs
dc.publisher.institutionCarleton University
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Toronto
dc.rights© Innovations: A Journal of Politics 1998-2023
dc.titleAre the Risks Real? Contemporary Opposition to the ICC
dc.typejournal article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
innovations_vol4_6_reid-and-chapnick-are-the-risks-real.pdf
Size:
659.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.94 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Volume 4, 2002-2003