Academic integrity policy analysis of Alberta and Manitoba colleges

dc.contributor.authorEaton, Sarah Elaine
dc.contributor.authorVogt, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorSeeland, Josh
dc.contributor.authorStoesz, Brenda M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-26T20:57:51Z
dc.date.available2023-05-26T20:57:51Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-01
dc.description.abstractDealing with matters related to academic integrity and academic misconduct can be challenging in higher education. As a result, students, educators, administrators, and other higher education professionals look to policy and procedures to help guide them through these complex situations. Policies are often representative of an institution’s culture of academic integrity. For these and other reasons it is therefore important that policies and procedures are reviewed regularly and updated to ensure that they align with current educational expectations and societal context. In this presentation, we share the results from our policy analysis of 16 colleges in the Canadian western provinces of Alberta and Manitoba. Data extraction and analyses were performed using a tool developed based on Bretag et al.’s five core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy. Our results showed inconsistencies in college polices in terms of the intended audience for the documents (e.g., students, faculty, administrators), varying levels of detail, inconsistent definitions, or categories of misconduct (e.g., plagiarism, cheating) and little mention of contract cheating. We compare the results of this study with previous academic integrity policy research in Canada for colleges in Ontario (Stoesz et al., 2019), as well as universities (Miron et al., 2021; Stoesz and Eaton, 2020). We also discuss the recent increase in the use of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT and GPT-3 and what this could mean in the context of academic integrity policy. We conclude with recommendations for policy reform in the Canadian college context. Our findings may be useful to those working in community colleges and polytechnics. This project is part of a larger project on academic integrity policy in Canada (https://osf.io/n9kwt/ ) Cite as: Eaton, S. E., Vogt, L., Seeland, J., & Stoesz, B. M. (2023). Academic integrity policy analysis of Alberta and Manitoba colleges. Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity (CSAI), Univeristy of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
dc.identifier.citationEaton, S. E., Vogt, L., Seeland, J., & Stoesz, B. M. (2023). Academic integrity policy analysis of Alberta and Manitoba colleges. Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity (CSAI), Univeristy of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/116575
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/41418
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisher.facultyWerklund School of Educationen
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.rightsUnless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.en
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectacademic integrity
dc.subjectpolicy
dc.subjectacademic misconduct
dc.subjectacademic dishonesty
dc.subjectequity
dc.subjectdiversity
dc.subjectinclusion
dc.subjectCanada
dc.subjecthigher education
dc.subjectcommunity college
dc.subjectAlberta
dc.subjectManitoba
dc.titleAcademic integrity policy analysis of Alberta and Manitoba colleges
dc.typeAnimation
ucalgary.scholar.levelFaculty
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CSAI 2022 Western Colleges AI Policy - Slides.pdf
Size:
4.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Slide deck for presentation
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: