ACSC Indicator: testing reliability for hypertension

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Robin L
dc.contributor.authorGhali, William A
dc.contributor.authorChen, Guanmin
dc.contributor.authorKhalsa, Tej K
dc.contributor.authorMangat, Birinder K
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Norm R C
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Elijah
dc.contributor.authorRabi, Doreen
dc.contributor.authorJette, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorDhanoa, Robyn
dc.contributor.authorQuan, Hude
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T12:02:43Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T12:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-26
dc.date.updated2018-09-26T12:02:43Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background With high-quality community-based primary care, hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) are considered avoidable. The purpose of this study was to test the inter-physician reliability of judgments of avoidable hospitalizations for one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, derived from medical chart review. Methods We applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s case definition to obtain a random sample of patients who had an ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension in Calgary, Alberta. Medical chart review was conducted by three experienced internal medicine specialists. Implicit methods were used to judge avoidability of hospitalization using a validated 5-point scale. Results There was poor agreement among three physicians raters when judging the avoidability of 82 ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension (κ = 0.092). The κ also remained low when assessing agreement between raters 1 and 3 (κ = 0.092), but the κ was lower (less than chance agreement) for raters 1 and 2 (κ = -0.119) and raters 2 and 3 (κ = -0.008). When the 5-point scale was dichotomized, there was fair agreement among three raters (κ = 0.217). The proportion of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension that were rated as avoidable was 32.9%, 6.1% and 26.8% for raters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions This study found a low proportion of ACSC hospitalization were rated as avoidable, with poor to fair agreement of judgment between physician raters. This suggests that the validity and utility of this health indicator is questionable. It points to a need to abandon the use of ACSC entirely; or alternatively to work on the development of explicit criteria for judging avoidability of hospitalization for ACSC such as hypertension.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):90
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0487-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/107905
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45909
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.titleACSC Indicator: testing reliability for hypertension
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12911_2017_Article_487.pdf
Size:
500.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: