Clinicians’ experiences implementing an advance care planning pathway in two Canadian provinces: a qualitative study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Julie
dc.contributor.authorElston, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorTan, Amy
dc.contributor.authorBarwich, Doris
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Rachel Z.
dc.contributor.authorCochrane, Diana
dc.contributor.authorFrenette, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-16T00:03:11Z
dc.date.available2024-06-16T00:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-15
dc.date.updated2024-06-16T00:03:11Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a process which enables patients to communicate wishes, values, fears, and preferences for future medical care. Despite patient interest in ACP, the frequency of discussions remains low. Barriers to ACP may be mitigated by involving non-physician clinic staff, preparing patients ahead of visits, and using tools to structure visits. An ACP care pathway incorporating these principles was implemented in longitudinal generalist outpatient care, including primary care/family medicine and general internal medicine, in two Canadian provinces. This study aims to understand clinician experiences implementing the pathway. Methods The pathway was implemented in one family practice in Alberta, two family practices in British Columbia (BC), and one BC internal medicine outpatient clinic. Physicians and allied health professionals delivered structured pathway visits based on the Serious Illness Conversation Guide. Twelve physicians and one social worker participated in interviews or focus groups at the end of the study period. Qualitative data were coded inductively using an iterative approach, with regular meetings between coders. Results Clinicians described experiences with the ACP care pathway, impact at the clinician level, and impact at the patient level. Within each domain, clinicians described barriers and facilitators experienced during implementation. Clinicians also reflected candidly about potential for future implementation and the sustainability of the pathway. Conclusions While the pathway was implemented slightly differently between provinces, core experiences were that implementation of the pathway, and integration with current practice, were feasible. Across settings, similar themes recurred regarding usefulness of the pathway structure and its tools, impact on clinician confidence and interactions with patients, teamwork and task delegation, compatibility with existing workflow, and patient preparation and readiness. Clinicians were supportive of ACP and of the pathway. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03508557). Registered April 25, 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03508557 .
dc.identifier.citationBMC Primary Care. 2024 Jun 15;25(1):217
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02468-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/118960
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/46556
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleClinicians’ experiences implementing an advance care planning pathway in two Canadian provinces: a qualitative study
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12875_2024_Article_2468.pdf
Size:
904.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications