Defining the short-term disease recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
| dc.contributor.author | Papalia, Nicholas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rohla, Amanda | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tang, Selphee | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nation, Jill | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nelson, Gregg | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-01T01:02:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-01T01:02:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-02-26 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2020-03-01T01:02:19Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background The goal of cervical cancer screening is to identify dysplastic lesions for subsequent excision in order to prevent invasive disease. There is clinical equipoise, on how to best follow women for disease surveillance after treatment with some Canadian provinces exclusively performing colposcopy and some utilizing Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing in addition to cervical cytology. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) is used to treat pre-invasive HPV-mediated disease and patients are typically followed for 12 months after disease excision. This study aims to quantify the prevalence of high-grade disease at the time of the second follow-up colposcopy visit, in a practice setting that utilizes laser ablation in addition to LEEP. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, consecutive patient charts were accessed through the electronic medical record system, ARIA, at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, in Calgary, Alberta, from January 2010 to December 2015. Data was extracted and a REDCap database was used to compile pertinent information from charts meeting inclusion criteria. Descriptive and analytic statistics were performed. Results Of the 303 patients identified, 221 patients met inclusion criteria. 86% of these patients met discharge criteria from colposcopy after the second follow up visit. 31 (14%) were seen in a subsequent visit for abnormal findings. Of these, 7 (3.2%) underwent further treatment for high-grade disease/Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3). Of the 31, 23 (10.6%) had a third – negative – visit, resulting in discharge from colposcopy. One patient had a repeat LEEP for persistent Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL). Conclusion In summary, our data demonstrates a prevalence of 3.2% of high-grade disease at the time of a second colposcopic follow up visit after treatment, in a setting which frequently utilizes laser ablation in combination with LEEP, for large lesions. This recurrence rate is consistent with most published literature on recurrence rates of CIN2/3. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Women's Health. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):34 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00901-1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/111701 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45937 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Defining the short-term disease recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |