A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
| dc.contributor.author | Kendal, Joseph K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abbott, Annalise | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kooner, Sahil | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johal, Herman | |
| dc.contributor.author | Puloski, Shannon K T | |
| dc.contributor.author | Monument, Michael J | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-26T12:03:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-09-26T12:03:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-08-06 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-09-26T12:03:48Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities (MBD-E) is challenging, and surgical directions pose significant implications for overall patient morbidity and mortality. Recent literature reviews on the surgical management of MBD-E present a paucity of high-level evidence and global inconsistencies in study design. In order to steer productive research, a scoping review was performed to map and assess critical knowledge gaps. Methods The Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping studies was followed. A comprehensive literature search identified a large body of literature pertaining to the surgical management of MBD-E. Study data and meta-data was extracted and presented using descriptive analytics and a thematic framework. Literature gaps were identified and analyzed. Results Three hundred eighty five studies from 1969 to 2017 were included. Studies were categorized into 11 separate themes, with the majority (63%) falling into the “surgical fixation strategies” theme, followed by “complications” at 7% and “prognosis and survival” at 6.2%. Less than 3% of studies were categorized in “patient related outcomes” or “epidemiology” themes. 89% of studies were retrospective and only 6 studies were of level 1 or 2 evidence. We identified a temporal increase in publication by decade, and all studies published on interventional radiology techniques or economic analyses were published after 2007 or 2009, respectively. 64.9% of studies were published in Europe and 20.3% were published in North America. Average patient age was 62 (± 5.2 years), and breast was the most common primary tumour (28%), followed by lung (17%) and kidney (15%). In terms of surgical location, 75% of operations involved the femur, followed by the humerus at 22% and tibia at 3%. Conclusions We present a descriptive overview of the current published literature on the surgical management of MBD-E. Critical knowledge gaps have been identified through the development of a thematic framework. Consolidation of literary gaps must involve bolstered efforts towards patient and family-engaged research initiatives and assessment of patient-related surgical outcomes. Multi-disciplinary engagement in developing prospective research will also help guide evidence-based personalized practice for these patients. By building on existing comprehensive patient databases and registries, knowledge on survival and prognostic parameters can be greatly improved. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018 Aug 06;19(1):279 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2210-8 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/107920 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45939 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |